It's been so long i have came across to write about life in viewing from another perspective.
The urge came by watching people day dreaming about being rich/ famous in an instant.
I LOL-ed at the arses who thought of becoming rich / famous in no time ( i knw u cud if ur born with a silver spoon ).
even before they graduated , they would plan ridiculous stuff , after graduate , open their own business , earn like fuck , and be rich like a fuck . I thought we Malaysians are heading towards a wise and smart direction, but what's with all these kampung-ish thinking.
Note i'm not laughing at ur gonna be rich / famous statement . It's definitely cool for everyone to have a dream. I am now knocking ur brilliant GONNA process .
When you dream,
You dream of driving ur sweet ferrari back to ur huge mansion. Reaching ur house with thousands of anticipating fans waiting for u to approach, requesting a autograph upon the magazines that has your face on the cover. After a day of numerous press conference, u dived in to a pool of cash .
When YOU came back to reality ,
You notice a ferrari can even buy ur whole God Damn house + vehicles,
you notice a mansion is like 10 of our toilet room sumed up together,
you notice we can't even publish our cute face in a small column of berita harian ,
you note that we can't even afford a trip to Pulau Ketam ( or even a stupid museum ticket ) ,
Instead of pool of cash , u got a pool of dirt to clean up in ur garden.
And i know people always say :
" I WILL ACHIEVE THAT ONE DAY "
Talking cock is very much like telling everyone u look like Brad Pitt . Maybe we won't even live to see ur ONE day
"I will become famous "
Let me make it clear, out of 5000000 millions peeps, there's only A A A A A A A David Beckham. And get urself a big big A3 size paper written " THIS IS MALAYSIA " and pin it infront of ur desktop .
" Even Bill Gates was a school drop out and he can make it "
Let me get ur facts right , Bill Gates was a top student in Physics and Mathematics u noob.
He's not a blardy drop out, He decided to quit his course when he know he's a second best to another student because he certainly cannot accept himself being a second best.
AND how many Bill Gates exsist ? A fucking Singular Person in A fucking Singular Planet in A big ass Singular Solar System.
www.wikipedia.org
The mentality is like a babi who plants a durian tree , who thought he manage to sell durians and become rich . Now that's a traditional babi thinking. if ur a babi , i will never blame you, cuz i know how stupid u can go.
It's not that i am poping ur bubble , just please return to earth , look at reality. Get on with the normal process like everyone does, some people go slow some people go fast.The twist will come if u try something at the right time. Unless ur that lucky , u strike a number.But the odds are certainly 100 000 to 1.
Friday, March 27, 2009
Monday, March 23, 2009
Becoming rather undignified in his old age - SAF
FERGUSON IS WRONG
Paul Tomkins 22 March 2009
Thankfully, most media outlets seem to have seen the massive inaccuracy in Alex Ferguson's figures relating to Liverpool's spending.
That he should even choose to come out with such figures in the first place is interesting, given his rather undignified reaction to Rafa's 'fact' press conference a couple of months back.
I'm also still smiling over his 'we were the better side' comments following their total humiliation last week, which every neutral I've spoken to found hilarious. That United played so well was obviously the reason Old Trafford was so empty in the last 10 minutes. He's also had a pop by excluding Rafa's name from the best managers in the league, which seems a bit childish for a pensioner.
You can't argue with Ferguson's success as a manager, but you can with some of the things he says.
This season may be a learning curve for Liverpool, with the league United's to lose even before their two main rivals were drawn against each other in the Champions League (which yet means the teams aspiring to catch United play each other in titanic, exhausting battles, as seen with Chelsea and Arsenal facing Liverpool last season while United get the easy draw.)
But the United manager is clearly worried, particularly as stability has been put in place at Anfield regarding the manager's future.
That the United manager should already be talking about Liverpool's future spending is fascinating. Why do so, unless he's worried?
Ferguson talks about the young players United have signed, and bizarrely says that Rafa, a man who started out in youth development, does things differently.
Perhaps Torres, Reina, Alonso, Mascherano, Agger, Lucas, Babel and Skrtel weren't all young players – aged 20-23 – when Rafa signed them after all, and all the teenage talent brought to the club, including Insua, Nemeth, Pacheco, Plessis and Ngog, is just a mirage?
How many players in their 30s has Rafa brought to the club? I can't think of one before or after Pellegrino, at 33, in 2005. Nor one as old as Henrik Larsson or Edwin van der Sar.
Robbie Keane was the oldest major signing Benítez has made, and perhaps the fact that he turns 29 this summer was why he was shipped out so quickly; at that age, if it doesn't look like it's working, you can't bide your time, particularly if a good offer comes in before the age-related depreciation takes place.
But the major flaw in Ferguson's argument is the fact that he already had half of his squad in place in 2004 when Rafa arrived.
He hasn't needed to rebuild an entire squad from scratch, merely add the £15m-£30m adornments. Rafa has clearly had to deal in quantity to cover all positions, but Ferguson has had the luxury of looking solely at quality.
So the two situations are poles apart. Ferguson had already spent big on players like Rio Ferdinand before Rafa pitched up.
He already had the players who emerged because of his youth system, which took almost seven years to bear fruit beyond one player (Giggs emerged in year five). Benítez would only be at that stage in 2011.
Indeed, if you add together every single player Rafa has bought (and there have been around 60, many of whom were mere kids), it still does not reach the total cost of United's current squad.
Even if you also add the cost of those players Rafa inherited who are still at the club (and there are just three), it still does not reach the total cost of United's current squad.
Including players out on loan (but not the full Tevez fee due this summer), United's squad costs over £215m, compared with Liverpool's £134m.
Let me remind you of what I said a few weeks back:
“Unless Ferguson is banned from fielding players like Ferdinand and Ronaldo (which would be illogical), or forced to start from scratch in 2004 (again illogical), it is not a fair comparison, is it? – I mean, come on, use your brain for a second here.”
Benítez is trying to overturn an established superpower, one that still has a dozen-or-so players who predate his arrival in England. Rafa has just three who were good enough and young enough to endure (not that Hyypia was young, but like Giggs he is evergreen).
As well as buy players, Rafa has had to change the culture of the club to fit in with his ideas, as all managers do; Ferguson did that 20 years ago. It's why it took him so long to win the title, as you cannot change things overnight.
Unless Benítez was going to try and compete for honours with the likes of Diao, Cheyrou, and Diouf, or players like Smicer, Dudek, Hamann and Henchoz, who are now all in their mid-30s (and therefore had a very short shelf-life), or injury-prone stars like Harry Kewell, Liverpool needed a fairly complete overhaul.
Particularly as Owen and Heskey had left, and Djibril Cissé was about to arrive, all of which had been pretty much decided before Rafa took the job. (Also, including Cissé as a Benítez signing only further skews the figures.)
So the inaccuracies are clear for all to see. But let's switch things a little.
How did Ferguson overtake Liverpool? The situation was very similar to that now, even if it was a long time ago now.
Remember, both Ferguson and Benítez arrived aged 44, and inherited squads that had averaged 4th over the previous four seasons, and finished 4th the season before they arrived. All the fours, then!
Each had a massive burden of expectation, brought about by a desperately long wait for the title. Alex Ferguson's average league position in his first five seasons at United was 8.6 (11th, 2nd, 11th, 13th, and 6th). Benítez's, if Liverpool finish only 3rd this season, will be 3.6.
But Ferguson faced in Liverpool in the '80s an established team with a top-class manager. He couldn't get close to Dalglish during their time in the respective dugouts.
Ferguson spent more money between 1986 and February 1991 (£12.8m gross, £9.87m net) than Dalglish managed in his six seasons (£12.5m gross, but only £5.77m net), but got nowhere near to toppling the Reds in that time.
So United's net spend was virtually twice that of Liverpool, and yet Ferguson still didn't trouble Dalglish. The money Ferguson spent wisely in the late '80s on players like Ince, Pallister, Hughes and Bruce took four years to have any effect on the league title. This is only Torres and Mascherano's second season.
So why did Ferguson spend so much more than Dalglish?
Well, Dalglish (like Ferguson in 2004) had a lot of his squad already in place.
Grobbelaar, Hansen, McMahon, Whelan and Nicol all spanned the entire period when Dalglish and Ferguson managed the two English superpowers.
(Liverpool raised £3.2m from selling Ian Rush in 1987, but the Reds also spend almost as much to bring him back a year later.)
Those men formed the heart of Dalglish's Liverpool.
They were five players who didn't need to be signed between 1986 and 1991; the kind of quality that could cost a king's ransom if they hadn't already been snapped up before at the top of their powers.
Ian Rush, the sixth name, also had a Liverpool connection which meant that although he needed to be re-signed, it was a relatively easy deal because of his time at Anfield.
Of course, Rush's initial departure led to the greatest influx of talent seen under Dalglish: the wonderful quartet of Aldridge, Beardsley, Barnes and Houghton. So Dalglish was partly 'blessed' in that Rush, whom he inherited, at least raised enough money to rebuild the attack upon his transfer.
Ferguson has enjoyed similar bonuses more recently: selling his best players for big fees as they approached their 30s (such as Stam, Beckham and Van Nistelrooy). Such sales now help keep Ferguson's net spend down, but in his first five years he couldn't get such impressive sums for Ron Atkinson's flops. So his net spend was very high for the times.
Again, make the comparison with Benítez and the likes of Diao and Cheyrou, who raised nothing.
Benítez never had such a luxury. Owen's value wasn't great due to his contract situation, leaving £10m less coming in. The only seriously saleable asset was Steven Gerrard.
The biggest profits Rafa has made have been on players he himself bought: Crouch, Bellamy, Sissoko. Of course, he hasn't been in the job long enough to sell his real gems, in the way Ferguson and Wenger (with Henry and Vieira) have picked the perfect time to cash in on world-class players aged 29/30/31.
If Rafa wanted to sell Torres he could make a massive profit, but thankfully the striker still has five years before he even reaches 30. So it's not relevant. Ideally, Torres would score loads of goals, win Liverpool titles, and return to his beloved Atletico no earlier than 2014 for a big fee.
Therefore you cannot ignore the way Ferguson overcame Liverpool – not by spending more, but by spending twice the amount.
So there you have it. It took the resignation of Dalglish to open the way for Ferguson, who had spent twice as much money but only averaged 9th place between 1986 and 1991. No wonder United fans wanted him out in 1990. But it just goes to show how difficult it is to overtake a side that already has the momentum, but that the best managers get there in the end.
If Ferguson is thinking back to how he did so, then no wonder he's feeling worried.
Paul Tomkins 22 March 2009
Thankfully, most media outlets seem to have seen the massive inaccuracy in Alex Ferguson's figures relating to Liverpool's spending.
That he should even choose to come out with such figures in the first place is interesting, given his rather undignified reaction to Rafa's 'fact' press conference a couple of months back.
I'm also still smiling over his 'we were the better side' comments following their total humiliation last week, which every neutral I've spoken to found hilarious. That United played so well was obviously the reason Old Trafford was so empty in the last 10 minutes. He's also had a pop by excluding Rafa's name from the best managers in the league, which seems a bit childish for a pensioner.
You can't argue with Ferguson's success as a manager, but you can with some of the things he says.
This season may be a learning curve for Liverpool, with the league United's to lose even before their two main rivals were drawn against each other in the Champions League (which yet means the teams aspiring to catch United play each other in titanic, exhausting battles, as seen with Chelsea and Arsenal facing Liverpool last season while United get the easy draw.)
But the United manager is clearly worried, particularly as stability has been put in place at Anfield regarding the manager's future.
That the United manager should already be talking about Liverpool's future spending is fascinating. Why do so, unless he's worried?
Ferguson talks about the young players United have signed, and bizarrely says that Rafa, a man who started out in youth development, does things differently.
Perhaps Torres, Reina, Alonso, Mascherano, Agger, Lucas, Babel and Skrtel weren't all young players – aged 20-23 – when Rafa signed them after all, and all the teenage talent brought to the club, including Insua, Nemeth, Pacheco, Plessis and Ngog, is just a mirage?
How many players in their 30s has Rafa brought to the club? I can't think of one before or after Pellegrino, at 33, in 2005. Nor one as old as Henrik Larsson or Edwin van der Sar.
Robbie Keane was the oldest major signing Benítez has made, and perhaps the fact that he turns 29 this summer was why he was shipped out so quickly; at that age, if it doesn't look like it's working, you can't bide your time, particularly if a good offer comes in before the age-related depreciation takes place.
But the major flaw in Ferguson's argument is the fact that he already had half of his squad in place in 2004 when Rafa arrived.
He hasn't needed to rebuild an entire squad from scratch, merely add the £15m-£30m adornments. Rafa has clearly had to deal in quantity to cover all positions, but Ferguson has had the luxury of looking solely at quality.
So the two situations are poles apart. Ferguson had already spent big on players like Rio Ferdinand before Rafa pitched up.
He already had the players who emerged because of his youth system, which took almost seven years to bear fruit beyond one player (Giggs emerged in year five). Benítez would only be at that stage in 2011.
Indeed, if you add together every single player Rafa has bought (and there have been around 60, many of whom were mere kids), it still does not reach the total cost of United's current squad.
Even if you also add the cost of those players Rafa inherited who are still at the club (and there are just three), it still does not reach the total cost of United's current squad.
Including players out on loan (but not the full Tevez fee due this summer), United's squad costs over £215m, compared with Liverpool's £134m.
Let me remind you of what I said a few weeks back:
“Unless Ferguson is banned from fielding players like Ferdinand and Ronaldo (which would be illogical), or forced to start from scratch in 2004 (again illogical), it is not a fair comparison, is it? – I mean, come on, use your brain for a second here.”
Benítez is trying to overturn an established superpower, one that still has a dozen-or-so players who predate his arrival in England. Rafa has just three who were good enough and young enough to endure (not that Hyypia was young, but like Giggs he is evergreen).
As well as buy players, Rafa has had to change the culture of the club to fit in with his ideas, as all managers do; Ferguson did that 20 years ago. It's why it took him so long to win the title, as you cannot change things overnight.
Unless Benítez was going to try and compete for honours with the likes of Diao, Cheyrou, and Diouf, or players like Smicer, Dudek, Hamann and Henchoz, who are now all in their mid-30s (and therefore had a very short shelf-life), or injury-prone stars like Harry Kewell, Liverpool needed a fairly complete overhaul.
Particularly as Owen and Heskey had left, and Djibril Cissé was about to arrive, all of which had been pretty much decided before Rafa took the job. (Also, including Cissé as a Benítez signing only further skews the figures.)
So the inaccuracies are clear for all to see. But let's switch things a little.
How did Ferguson overtake Liverpool? The situation was very similar to that now, even if it was a long time ago now.
Remember, both Ferguson and Benítez arrived aged 44, and inherited squads that had averaged 4th over the previous four seasons, and finished 4th the season before they arrived. All the fours, then!
Each had a massive burden of expectation, brought about by a desperately long wait for the title. Alex Ferguson's average league position in his first five seasons at United was 8.6 (11th, 2nd, 11th, 13th, and 6th). Benítez's, if Liverpool finish only 3rd this season, will be 3.6.
But Ferguson faced in Liverpool in the '80s an established team with a top-class manager. He couldn't get close to Dalglish during their time in the respective dugouts.
Ferguson spent more money between 1986 and February 1991 (£12.8m gross, £9.87m net) than Dalglish managed in his six seasons (£12.5m gross, but only £5.77m net), but got nowhere near to toppling the Reds in that time.
So United's net spend was virtually twice that of Liverpool, and yet Ferguson still didn't trouble Dalglish. The money Ferguson spent wisely in the late '80s on players like Ince, Pallister, Hughes and Bruce took four years to have any effect on the league title. This is only Torres and Mascherano's second season.
So why did Ferguson spend so much more than Dalglish?
Well, Dalglish (like Ferguson in 2004) had a lot of his squad already in place.
Grobbelaar, Hansen, McMahon, Whelan and Nicol all spanned the entire period when Dalglish and Ferguson managed the two English superpowers.
(Liverpool raised £3.2m from selling Ian Rush in 1987, but the Reds also spend almost as much to bring him back a year later.)
Those men formed the heart of Dalglish's Liverpool.
They were five players who didn't need to be signed between 1986 and 1991; the kind of quality that could cost a king's ransom if they hadn't already been snapped up before at the top of their powers.
Ian Rush, the sixth name, also had a Liverpool connection which meant that although he needed to be re-signed, it was a relatively easy deal because of his time at Anfield.
Of course, Rush's initial departure led to the greatest influx of talent seen under Dalglish: the wonderful quartet of Aldridge, Beardsley, Barnes and Houghton. So Dalglish was partly 'blessed' in that Rush, whom he inherited, at least raised enough money to rebuild the attack upon his transfer.
Ferguson has enjoyed similar bonuses more recently: selling his best players for big fees as they approached their 30s (such as Stam, Beckham and Van Nistelrooy). Such sales now help keep Ferguson's net spend down, but in his first five years he couldn't get such impressive sums for Ron Atkinson's flops. So his net spend was very high for the times.
Again, make the comparison with Benítez and the likes of Diao and Cheyrou, who raised nothing.
Benítez never had such a luxury. Owen's value wasn't great due to his contract situation, leaving £10m less coming in. The only seriously saleable asset was Steven Gerrard.
The biggest profits Rafa has made have been on players he himself bought: Crouch, Bellamy, Sissoko. Of course, he hasn't been in the job long enough to sell his real gems, in the way Ferguson and Wenger (with Henry and Vieira) have picked the perfect time to cash in on world-class players aged 29/30/31.
If Rafa wanted to sell Torres he could make a massive profit, but thankfully the striker still has five years before he even reaches 30. So it's not relevant. Ideally, Torres would score loads of goals, win Liverpool titles, and return to his beloved Atletico no earlier than 2014 for a big fee.
Therefore you cannot ignore the way Ferguson overcame Liverpool – not by spending more, but by spending twice the amount.
So there you have it. It took the resignation of Dalglish to open the way for Ferguson, who had spent twice as much money but only averaged 9th place between 1986 and 1991. No wonder United fans wanted him out in 1990. But it just goes to show how difficult it is to overtake a side that already has the momentum, but that the best managers get there in the end.
If Ferguson is thinking back to how he did so, then no wonder he's feeling worried.
Thursday, March 19, 2009
BREAKING NEWS!
Fabio Aurelio the Brazilian Maestro is about to join " BRITS GOT TALENT" by performing his sick magic trick.
As when he scored Liverpool's 3rd, 46,000 fans went missing.
Now can u beat that , David Cooperfield??!!
As when he scored Liverpool's 3rd, 46,000 fans went missing.
Now can u beat that , David Cooperfield??!!
Monday, March 16, 2009
YNLTS
This was AFTER the lost at Old Trafford last season.
This was AFTER we rocked Old Trafford .
Did u notice something?
The difference between us is,
You Never Leave The Seats.
This was AFTER we rocked Old Trafford .
Did u notice something?
The difference between us is,
You Never Leave The Seats.
Saturday, March 14, 2009
Who the fuck are Man Utd?
Old Trafford 14th March 2009
Prologue :I was so amazed that this morning, i see no taunting nicknames / sms-es of pre-game taunting from the ManScums. I was feeling weird u know, cuz a man scum will nv fail to do so ( but there's one i don't wanna mention haha! )
I found the source: They are scared, after watching us demolishing the 9th times european champions.
On this bright afternoon, our golden #9 and captain fantastic humiliated the duos' who's actually being crowned BEST DEFENSIVE PAIRS in Europe, aka Vidic and Ferdinand.Well Vidic was so owned to an extend, that i would love to download the replay of him getting a NUTMEG aka OLE from Torres Sanz
Vidic was proved as a " Dirty " player for pulling and dragging El Nino down. At a moment , i was thinking that the official isn't making any sense for letting him go for several time.
Not dirty enough?
Following in the 2nd period, our captain has gone on clear with a superb turn on the dirty one. And yet he wrestled him down. This time the man in charge got the call right.I rather get the goal than giving the dirty scum a red . When Fabio stood up to take the kick , lil did we know that it's gonna turn in as he seldom takes the spot kick himself. Well, Van Der Sar who was so overated , stood still like a statue and watched the ball making it's way in.
Ok scums, actually i was expecting the team to defend after this goal. But i am so sorry, my bad bad Boss aka Rafael Benitez, log Babel in . And the score shud have been 5-1 , with my dear captain giving u a sympathy kick of air.
So it's 4-1 to u ( 5-1 with mercy ).
So remember today , OLD TRAFFORD WE BEAT U 4-1 .
Although i know most of u will go " SO WHAT ? WE ARE STILL LEADING "
Yea, i knw. Cuz the response is so typical from a Scum, who had never gone tru hard times or the process of accepting a defeat ( yea dudes, i know ur screwed glory hunting attitude so well)
But (If) 08/09 BPL champions lost 2ce to Liverpool? WHAT A CHAMPION U ARE!
i also see a big bunch of glory hunting fans leaving the stands before the game actually ended.
Such a big disgrace to watch ur fans walk out on u . SUCH A GLORY HUNTING FANS in Such a GLORY HUNTING stadium . Now my words are proved. We don't walk out on our teams even if the defeat of 10-0. Trust me , u will be amazed by the kop's loyalty.
and again ...
Why ? Rooney u hate us ? u know wat? I don't give a shit
Huh? Alex ferguson needs some explanation on Rafa's critics? Answer: 4 star Liverpool!
Where are u scums when we finished u guys off?
The Kops stayed back with the Torres Song after we lost in OT last season.
We stayed silence even we beat u 2-1 beggining of the season.
WHO THE FUCK ARE MAN UTD ?
For those who thought i was being harsh , and goin over the limit ( in fact i don't even taunt them at all, even we won the rivalry and other honours) .
U should put urself in my position for the past 12 years. From nonsensical taunting to stupidity of a football fans , I've experienced it all. I am so used to it , that i no longer care .
This is my first / last taunt of a rivalry match to you, get a taste of ur own medicine.
Walk on my fellow Reds , Walk On :)
Wednesday, March 11, 2009
Glory Glory ( hunters )
The Reason why i don't speak about Football issues with a Manscums.
" Wa , Liverpool beat Madrid 4-0, If vs Man Utd sure 10 - 0 le , Juventus also noob la , lose to draw with Chelsea at home . "
After they won their rivals,
" Noob! Chelsea / Liverpool / Arsenal all losers "
After a lost to arch rivals,
" Wa u all play damn well wey , we deserved to lose "
Scums, are u so afraid that I will taunt u that u gotta keep my mouth shut 1st?
Did all these similar lines crossed ur heart/mind? Lul
even worse,
" What is Munich Air disaster? "
hahaha
I believe most of em who's within my range of age between 18 - 30
Goes this way :
I Respected him with his honesty LOL
to be even stupider
And most of us came across this situation if ur not a scumhead
That's why i've learnt to shut it against man scums :D
" Wa , Liverpool beat Madrid 4-0, If vs Man Utd sure 10 - 0 le , Juventus also noob la , lose to draw with Chelsea at home . "
After they won their rivals,
" Noob! Chelsea / Liverpool / Arsenal all losers "
After a lost to arch rivals,
" Wa u all play damn well wey , we deserved to lose "
Scums, are u so afraid that I will taunt u that u gotta keep my mouth shut 1st?
Did all these similar lines crossed ur heart/mind? Lul
even worse,
" What is Munich Air disaster? "
hahaha
I believe most of em who's within my range of age between 18 - 30
Goes this way :
I Respected him with his honesty LOL
to be even stupider
And most of us came across this situation if ur not a scumhead
That's why i've learnt to shut it against man scums :D
My List
CHECK LIST
[X] Gotten detention. ( Always :D )
[ ] Gotten your phone taken away in class.
[ ] Gotten suspended.
[X] Gotten caught chewing gum. ( Wrigley's Double Mint ,Yummm... )
[ ] Gotten caught cheating on a test.
[X] Arrived late to class more than 5 times.
[X] Didn’t do homework over 5 times ( I never Lol! )
[X] Turned at least 3 projects in late
[X] Missed school cause you felt like it.
[X] Laughed so loud you got kicked out of class.
[ ] Got your mom / dad etc. to get you out of school.
[X] Texted people during class.
[X] Passed notes.
[X] Threw stuff across the room. ( Note: Shu Hwai's pants )
[X] Laughed at the teacher.
[ ] Pulled down the Fire Alarm.
[X] Went on Myspace , Facebook , Xanga , etc. on the computer at school. ( Friendster / Soccernet for the Lol )
[X] Took Pictures during school hours.
[X] Called someone during School hours.
[X] Listened to an iPod , CD , etc... During class. ( Classical Disc-man )
[ ] Threw something at the teacher.
[X] Went outside the classroom without permission. ( Sorry i lost count )
[X] Broke the dress code.
[X] Failed a class. ( Prinsip Perakaunan is a OMFG )
[X] Ate food during class.
[X] Gotten a call from school.
[ ] Couldn’t go on a field trip cause you behaved badly.
[X] Didn’t take your stuff to school. ( " Teacher , i forgot to bring my homework la " x100000 )
[X] Gotten a detention and didn't go.
[X] Stuck up your middle finger at a teacher when they were not looking. ( Coward Style Heh! )
[X] Cursed during class loud enough so the teacher could hear.
[ ] Faked your parents signature. ( mum's and dad's signature is too hard to be imitate , zzz )
[X] Slept in class. ( nonsense question )
[X] Cursed at a teacher to their face. ( Gila is counted omfg. )
[X] Copied homework. ( another stupid question )
[X] Skipping School to hang out in a Cyber Cafe / Mall / etc . ( Is a MUST ! )
[X] Got caught skipping school. ( An memorable scenario to date, it's just too funny )
[X] Got wacked in the butt by the teachers. ( Another lame question )
[X] Involved in Social Fighting . ( I was the watcher aka as the " tai sui lou ")
[X] Bullied a friend . ( Shu Hwai , Everyone does )
[X] Popular for being the baddie . ( Ponteng is counted right ? )
[ ] Look Beneath a girl's skirt. ( sick! )
[ ] Being involved in gangsterism ( guai zhai )
Ok i guess i ruined my teenage life quite enough. But without these, high school is not memorable after all :D
Omfg i miss school , Tee heeee
[X] Gotten detention. ( Always :D )
[ ] Gotten your phone taken away in class.
[ ] Gotten suspended.
[X] Gotten caught chewing gum. ( Wrigley's Double Mint ,Yummm... )
[ ] Gotten caught cheating on a test.
[X] Arrived late to class more than 5 times.
[X] Didn’t do homework over 5 times ( I never Lol! )
[X] Turned at least 3 projects in late
[X] Missed school cause you felt like it.
[X] Laughed so loud you got kicked out of class.
[ ] Got your mom / dad etc. to get you out of school.
[X] Texted people during class.
[X] Passed notes.
[X] Threw stuff across the room. ( Note: Shu Hwai's pants )
[X] Laughed at the teacher.
[ ] Pulled down the Fire Alarm.
[X] Went on Myspace , Facebook , Xanga , etc. on the computer at school. ( Friendster / Soccernet for the Lol )
[X] Took Pictures during school hours.
[X] Called someone during School hours.
[X] Listened to an iPod , CD , etc... During class. ( Classical Disc-man )
[ ] Threw something at the teacher.
[X] Went outside the classroom without permission. ( Sorry i lost count )
[X] Broke the dress code.
[X] Failed a class. ( Prinsip Perakaunan is a OMFG )
[X] Ate food during class.
[X] Gotten a call from school.
[ ] Couldn’t go on a field trip cause you behaved badly.
[X] Didn’t take your stuff to school. ( " Teacher , i forgot to bring my homework la " x100000 )
[X] Gotten a detention and didn't go.
[X] Stuck up your middle finger at a teacher when they were not looking. ( Coward Style Heh! )
[X] Cursed during class loud enough so the teacher could hear.
[ ] Faked your parents signature. ( mum's and dad's signature is too hard to be imitate , zzz )
[X] Slept in class. ( nonsense question )
[X] Cursed at a teacher to their face. ( Gila is counted omfg. )
[X] Copied homework. ( another stupid question )
[X] Skipping School to hang out in a Cyber Cafe / Mall / etc . ( Is a MUST ! )
[X] Got caught skipping school. ( An memorable scenario to date, it's just too funny )
[X] Got wacked in the butt by the teachers. ( Another lame question )
[X] Involved in Social Fighting . ( I was the watcher aka as the " tai sui lou ")
[X] Bullied a friend . ( Shu Hwai , Everyone does )
[X] Popular for being the baddie . ( Ponteng is counted right ? )
[ ] Look Beneath a girl's skirt. ( sick! )
[ ] Being involved in gangsterism ( guai zhai )
Ok i guess i ruined my teenage life quite enough. But without these, high school is not memorable after all :D
Omfg i miss school , Tee heeee
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
